'Indian Penal Code' (IPC, Hindi: भारतीय दण्ड संहिता) is the main criminal code of India. It is a comprehensive code, intended to cover all substantive aspects of criminal law. It was drafted in 1860 and came into force in colonial India during the British Raj in 1862. It has since been amended several times and is now supplemented by other criminal provisions.
After independence, Indian Penal Code was inherited by Pakistan (now called Pakistan Penal Code) and Bangladesh, formerly part of British India. It was also adopted wholesale by the British colonial authorities in Burma, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Singapore and Brunei, and remains the basis of the criminal codes in those countries.
Contents[hide] |
[edit]History
The draft of the Indian Penal Code was prepared by the First Law Commission. It was chaired by Lord Macaulay. Its basis is the law of England freed from superfluities, technicalities and local peculiarities. Suggestions were also derived from the French Penal Code and from Livingstone's Code of Louisiana. The draft underwent a very careful revision at the hands of Sir Barnes Peacock, Chief Justice, and puisne Judges of the Calcutta Supreme Court who were members of the Legislative Council, and was passed into law in Oct 6,1860, unfortunately Macaulay did not survive to see his masterpiece enacted into a law.
The Indian Penal Code was submitted to the Governor-General of India in Council in 1837, but was not until 1860 that it took its place on the Indian Statute Book. Before 1860, The English Criminal Law, as modified by several Acts was administered in the Presidency-Towns of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras.
The Code is universally acknowledged as a cogently drafted code ahead of its time[citation needed]. It has substantially survived for over 150 years in several jurisdictions without major amendments. Modern crimes involving technology unheard of during Macaulay's time fit easily under the Code[citation needed].
[edit]Classification of offences under the code
Indian Penal Code, 1860, covers large types of Offences and they are Classified into following types:
| Chapter | Sections Covered | Classification of Offences |
|---|---|---|
| Chapter I | Sections 1 to 5 | Introduction |
| Chapter II | Sections 6 to 52 | General Explanations |
| Chapter III | Sections 53 to 75 | of Punishments |
| Chapter IV | Sections 76 to 106 | General Exceptions of the Right of Private Defence (Sections 96 to 106) |
| Chapter V | Sections 107 to 120 | Of Abetment |
| Chapter VA | Sections 120A to 120B | Criminal Conspiracy Added in 1913 |
| Chapter VI | Sections 121 to 130 | Of Offences against the State |
| Chapter VII | Sections 131 to 140 | Of Offences relating to the Army, Navy and Air Force Navy and Air Force: Added in 1927 |
| Chapter VIII | Sections 141 to 160 | Of Offences against the Public Tranquillity |
| Chapter IX | Sections 161 to 171 | Of Offences by or relating to Public Servants |
| Chapter X | Sections 172 to 190 | Of Contempts of Lawful Authority of Public Servants |
| Chapter XI | Sections 191 to 229 | Of False Evidence and Offences against Public Justice |
| Chapter XII | Sections 230 to 263 | Of Offences relating to coin and Government Stamps |
| Chapter XIII | Sections 264 to 267 | Of Offences relating to Weight and Measures |
| Chapter XIV | Sections 268 to 294 | Of Offences affecting the Public Health, Safety, Convenience, Decency and Morals |
| Chapter XV | Sections 295 to 298 | Of Offences relating to Religion |
| Chapter XVI | Sections 299 to 377 | Of Offences affecting the Human Body
|
| Chapter XVII | Sections 378 to 462 | Of Offences Against Property
|
| Chapter XVIII | Sections 463 to 489 | Of Offences relating to Documents and Property Marks
Added in 1958 |
| Chapter XIX | Sections 490 to 492 | Of the Criminal Breach of Contracts of Service |
| Chapter XX | Sections 493 to 498 | Of Offences Relating to Marriage |
| Chapter XXA | Sections 498A | Of Cruelty by Husband or Relatives of Husband Added in 1983 |
| Chapter XXI | Sections 499 to 502 | Of Defamation |
| Chapter XXII | Sections 503 to 510 | Of Criminal intimidation, Insult and Annoyance |
| Chapter XXIII | Section 511 | Of Attempts to Commit Offences |
| Section | Offense[1] |
|---|---|
| 376 | Rape |
| 365 | Kidnapping or abducting |
| 323 | Causing hurt |
| 304 | Culpable homicide |
| 302 | Murder |
| 506 | Criminal intimidation |
| 351 | Assault |
[edit]Reforms
- The section 377 had been used against legitimate rights of sexual minorities in India. This section has been termed as the biggest hurdle in dealing with control of HIV/AIDS in the Country. But the Delhi High Court on 2nd of July 2009 gave a liberal interpretation to this section and laid down that this section cannot be used to punish the act of consensual sexual(anal) intercourse between two adult males. This was incorrectly termed by many people including reputed media houses as amendment of this section which it was not.
- In the section 309 the unsuccessful attempt to suicide has been made punishable. Rather than providing suitable counseling to the victim, the section punishes the victim. This section has been the result of the colonial society where people did not have rights of their own.
- Section 497 deals with adultery, which punishes men even for consensual sex with another persons wife.
In 2003, the Malimath Committee submitted its report recommending several far-reaching penal reforms including separation of investigation and prosecution (similar to the CPS in the UK) to streamline the clogged up Indian criminal justice system.[2]
The essence of the report was a perceived need for shift from an adversarial to an inquisitorial criminal justice system, based on the Continental European systems.
Some other recent incidents have again pointed fingers at rewriting the Penal code. In 2009, a court in Maharashtra ordered that a person who was imprisoned falsely for 10 years be given a compensation of Rs.1 lakh (2222 USD). Another case which came to light in 2009 thrown light on how the criminal justice system in India could be influenced by the powerful. A higher police officer who molested a minor in 1990 (the minor committed suicide after 3 years due to continuous persecution of her family by the police officer) got away with an imprisonment for just 6 months. ( See Ruchika Girhotra Case )
Many of the Sections in the Indian Penal Code Monetary Fine amounts have become out dated for Eg.- Under Section 188 which is for Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant Italic text-- Prescribes the fine amount to be only two hundred rupees.-- which in today's India can hardly have any deterrent effect upon any Criminal. Parliament needs to revise the fine amounts prescribed for various offenses under The Indian Penal Code.
[edit]See also
[edit]References
- Indian Penal Code, 1860
- http://www.indianlawcds.com/Criminalbareacts/IPC.htm
- http://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/IndianPenalCode/indianpenalcode.htm
[edit]External links
| This Indian history-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
| This article about the law of India is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |